2017 Grad Slam Competition
The Berkeley Grad Slam Competition is Coming Right Up!
Wednesday, April 5, 2017
3:00 to 5:30 pm
309 Sproul Hall
Eight semi-finalists (chosen on the basis of their video submissions) will compete in the campus-wide live competition. Colleagues and friends of the competitors are warmly invited to attend! (Learn more about the semi-finalists.)
The three finalists will receive prizes of $750, $1,000, and $3,000, respectively, with the top finalist advancing to the system-wide event.
What is Grad Slam?
Grad Slam is a UC-sponsored competitive speaking event designed to showcase graduate student research in three-minute talks pitched to a general audience. Entrants compete in preliminary rounds on their UC campus, with prizes awarded at each stage of the selection process.
This is a unique opportunity for graduate students who are engaged in substantive original research projects to develop oratorical skills, dynamic deliveries, and compelling content when presenting their academic research — while attracting the notice of academic, media, and private and public sector leaders from across the state.
What comes next?
The UC-wide Grad Slam championship event!
On Thursday, May 4, 2017, Berkeley’s champion will compete against graduate student peers at the UC system-wide championship competition. This event will again be hosted by LinkedIn at its downtown San Francisco center and emceed by UC President Janet Napolitano. Competitors will be judged by notable leaders in industry, government, and media.
The top three prizes at the system-wide competition are $1,000 (third place), $3,000 (second place), and $6,000 for the winner of the prestigious UCOP Grad Slam “Slammy” award.
Summary of the Process
- Student videos submitted by the application deadline of February 15 are rated by a panel of judges.
- Semi-finalists are selected for the second-round live competition.
- On April 5, semi-finalists deliver live presentations before judges and audience members on the UC Berkeley campus.
- On the basis of these presentations, three finalists are selected, two by the panel of judges and one “people’s choice” by audience members.
- The first-place finalist represents Berkeley at the UC-wide championship round on May 4. (The second-place finalist is prepared to compete if the first-place finalist withdraws.)
- Eligibility: All graduate students enrolled in a Master’s or doctoral program at UC Berkeley who are engaged in substantive original research projects.
- In cases of presentation of a collaborative research project, the presenter’s contribution to the project must be salient and clearly specified.
- Visuals: PowerPoint slides are allowed but optional (no Prezi or other presentation formats).
- Maximum of three slides, exclusive of title slide to be generated by UCOP.
- All work on the slides must be original to the student and cannot be generated by a professional.
- Embedding of audio and/or video clips is allowed (clips may contain animation).
- No PowerPoint animations are allowed.
- Props may be allowed with advance approval by the program coordinators, provided they need minimal set-up and produce no mess.
- Timing will commence from the moment the speaker begins her/his presentation. The presentation begins at the moment the speaker engages with the audience (if s/he starts with a hand clap, a gesture, an audio or video clip or any other such engagement, prior to speaking, the clock begins at that time; if there is no such engagement the clock starts when the student begins speaking). If the speaker continues past three minutes, points will be deducted from the final score, beginning with one point at 3:03, and one point every two additional seconds thereafter.
Judging in the first round will be conducted by a UC Berkeley committee of faculty members and graduate students. In the second round, judges will be drawn from University alumni, staff, and other campus affiliates from varied academic fields and backgrounds. Audience members will select the “people’s choice” finalist.
Contestants will be rated on:
- Clarity: Did the speaker provide adequate background knowledge to make the talk and the importance of the project understandable?
- Organization: Did the presentation follow a clear and logical sequence?
- Delivery: Pace, enthusiasm, confidence, body language, eye contact, vocal range, etc.
- Visuals: If used, did the slides and/or props enhance the presentation and help to emphasize the primary points of the talk? Were the slides well-designed, clear, legible, and concise?
- Appropriateness: Was the topic and its significance communicated in language appropriate to an intelligent but non-specialist audience? Did the speaker avoid or explain discipline-specific jargon?
- Intellectual significance of research discussed: Did the speaker explain why her/his project matters (for example, its significance to the academic discipline or to specific problems in the world)?
- Engagement: To what extent did the talk engage the audience’s intellectual curiosity? Did it inspire the audience to want to learn more about the topic?
A panel of judges will select up to ten semi-finalists from video submissions received by the February 15 deadline. Those semi-finalists will be invited to compete live before a second panel of judges and campus audience. All competitors will receive at least $100, with the third-, second-, and first-place finalists receiving, respectively, $750, $1,000, and $3,000.
The first-place finalist will enter the May 4, 2017, UC system-wide contest (the second-place finalist will be asked to be prepared to compete in case of withdrawal by the first-place finalist). From among the ten UC campus representatives, a panel of distinguished judges will select three system-wide winners. The top winner will be awarded $6,000, and the first and second runner-ups will receive $3,000 and $1,000, respectively.
If the Berkeley contestant wins or places in the UC-wide competition, the total award would be from $4,000 to $9,000.
Preparing to Compete in Grad Slam
A variety of resources are available to help you prepare for the Grad Slam competition:
- How to Talk like TED by Carmine Gallo, Article by Guy Kawasaki
- 10 Most Common Rookie Mistakes in Public Speaking by Terry Gault, Managing Partner and Vice President of the Henderson Group
- Giving an Academic Talk by Jonathan Shewchuk, Associate Professor in Computer Science, University of California at Berkeley
- Giving Oral Presentations from English Communication for Scientists by Jean-luc Doumont (ed.), Nature (2010)
- Presentation Zen by Garr Reynolds
- Making the Most of Your Three Minutes for 3MT: The Three Minute Thesis by Simon Clews, Director, Writing Centre, University of Melbourne
- 10 Hints for Improving Presentations for the Three Minute Thesis Competition by Danielle Fischer, Charles Darwin University
- Presentation Skills: Overcoming Stage Fright from the GradPost
- Top Ten Tips for Writing and Delivering Very Brief Speeches by Bill Cole, Founder and CEO of William B. Cole Consultants
- TED Talks: Approximately three-minute talks on “ideas worth spreading.”
- Ph.D. Comics Two-Minute Thesis: Ph.D. Comics challenged graduate students to explain their work in two minutes – the best have been turned into videos!
- Three-Minute Thesis Showcase: Winning Three-Minute Thesis Presentations from Around the World
- Three Minute Thesis presentations: Humanities: Three-minute presentations from the University of Queensland 3MT database.
Learn from the 2015 and 2016 Berkeley Finalists
Last year’s finalist, Kelsey Sakimoto, presented his research on creating a better, more efficient version of photosynthesis at the interface of chemistry and biology. Kelsey has taught bacteria “to grow and cover their bodies with tiny semi-conductor nanocrystals” which function as solar panels. This cyborg “bacterial army” can “grow and photosynthesize food, fuels, pharmaceuticals, and plastics using solar energy” more efficiently than chlorophyll and at a fraction of the cost of solar panels.
Berkeley’s 2015 winner, Alexis Shusterman presented her project on monitoring carbon dioxide in high-definition using the analogy of pixels. “We live in an era of high definition,” she said. “We know having more pixels makes life better.” She described a new approach to monitoring carbon dioxide as part of BEACO2N (Berkeley Atmospheric CO2 Observation Network), a hi-def carbon dioxide monitoring instrument.
Read about last year’s competition at Berkeley:
Learn from the System-Wide Finalists
Check out the previous system-wide UC Grad Slam events and winners: